A Supreme Court abortion ruling impacts how states decide the value of a woman’s life. On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States decided that the Constitution does not confer a right to an abortion, overturning previous rulings for Roe v. Wade and Casey v. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania. This ruling, in response to Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, has significant implications for women’s rights across the country.
Supreme Court abortion ruling Relies on Archaic Laws
Justice Alito’s opinion in the ruling leaned heavily on historical context, citing laws from the 13th and 17th centuries. This reliance on outdated legal precedents raises questions about the fairness of using such ancient laws to make decisions affecting modern women’s rights.
Supreme Court abortion ruling says Rights Not Listed in the Constitution
The Constitution does not explicitly list several rights that Americans enjoy today, such as the right to a fair trial, the right to vote, and the right to privacy. With the Supreme Court’s recent decision, does this mean that these rights are now vulnerable to reassessment?
Supreme Court argues “safe haven” laws
Justice Alito argues that “safe haven” laws mitigate the concerns about unwanted pregnancies. However, with over 424,000 children in American foster care, this argument seems insufficient to address the broader issues faced by women seeking abortions.
Political Power and the 2020 Election: Are Women’s Rights Being Undermined?
The ruling also references women’s political power, noting their significant role in the 2020 election. While women made up 51.5% of the population of Mississippi and 55.5% of voters, relying on a single year’s statistics to justify sweeping legal changes appears problematic.
State Laws and Women’s Health: What Are the Immediate Consequences?
Following the Supreme Court’s ruling, various states enacted trigger laws, ranging from total bans to restrictive gestational limits. Many of these laws, rooted in the 1800s, reflect historical concerns rather than contemporary medical and ethical standards.
The Supreme Court’s Broader Implications: What’s Next for Women’s Rights?
Justice Thomas has suggested revisiting other rights, such as contraception and same-sex marriage, which are not explicitly covered by the Constitution. This raises concerns about the potential for further erosion of personal freedoms.
Conclusion: Women’s Rights and Constitutional Limitations
The Constitution, created by men of their time, has been amended to address various injustices. The recent overturning of Roe v. Wade without providing alternative protections for women’s health suggests a troubling disregard for women’s autonomy. What will it take for women to unite and demand equal rights without legal restrictions?
Follow for more of my Thoughts and Things.
